COMPARISON OF SCREENING METHODS TO REFINE MSW COMPOST

BioCycle April 2005, Vol. 46, No. 4, p. 57

Study at the Edmonton cocomposting facility compares amount of foreign matter in finished product after passing compost through a ball screen, single trommel and double trommel.

Natasha Page, Jerry Leonard and Grant Clark

 

To continue reading this article, Log In
 or Sign Up (if you are a paid BioCycle subscriber).

If you are not a subscriber, join BioCycle today!
the one and only magazine and website on
Composting, Organics Recycling, Anaerobic Digestion

 

This entry was posted on Friday, April 15th, 2005 at 11:30 am and is filed under Subscription required. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

Comments are closed.